Tuesday, April 8, 2008

Junot Diaz Wins Pulitzer

One of the most wonderful novelists I've ever interviewed was named wiinner of the Pulitzer Prize for Literature yesterday. Juno Diaz is a native of the Dominican Republic while also being a native of New Jersey.

His book, The Brief Wondrous Life of Oscar Wao, tells the story of a geeky immigrant kid who loves to write and dreams of being the Dominican JRR Tolkien. I spoke with Junot last fall at the KBOO studios, one of those interviews with someone you had never heard of but after conducting a Google Five Point Search, you suddenly discover he's very, very famous among those who have heard of him.

Plus, wonderful, intelligent, sexy and political; my favorite part of the interview was his analysis on why more and more people should be encouraged to write fiction -- because, he said, where there are more writers, there are more readers. And in the US of A, fewer and fewer people read books.




Here's
the interview.

IPA: Interviews Available on Muqtada al-Sadr

PM Tuesday, April 8, 2008

PATRICK COCKBURN, via Katie Monaghan, katherine.monaghan@simonandschuster.com
Currently in London, Cockburn is available for a limited number of
interviews. He is author of the just-published "Muqtada: Muqtada al-Sadr,
the Shia Revival, and the Struggle for Iraq." An excerpt from the book is
available at: .
Seymour Hersh has called Cockburn, who writes for the British paper
The Independent, "quite simply, the best Western journalist at work in Iraq
today." His previous books include "The Occupation: War, resistance and
daily life in Iraq."

Institute for Public Accuracy

Monday, April 7, 2008

Storytelling Grant: This Just in from Our Friends at Airwaves and Liberty

National Storytelling Network Invites Applications for Applied Storytelling Award

Posted: 07 Apr 2008 10:47 AM CDT

Deadline: May 2, 2008 (Preliminary proposals)

The National Storytelling Network ( http://www.storynet.org/ ) invites applications for the fifth annual Brimstone Award for Applied Storytelling.

The award focuses on the transformational properties of story-telling and aims to increase understanding of the ways story-telling can promote change in individuals and communities.

The award provides a grant of $5,000 for a project that will be completed in calendar year 2009. The grant will support a model storytelling project that is service-oriented, based in a community or organization, and to some extent replicable in other places and situations. Many different sorts of projects can be considered for the award, including community, organizational or institutional programs, curricular activities, short residencies, and projects combining complementary art forms.

Applicants who are not members of the National Storytelling Network must pay the current membership fee to become an NSN member.

Program information and an application form are available at the NSN Web site.

Oregon Public Broadcasting Hiring a Reporter

Reporter/Producer II Radio Department
Position: Full-Time, Non-exempt, Regular Status
Compensation: Salary, plus benefits package
Position Summary: Produce high quality, feature and spot news stories for OPB Radio, for a specific beat, within the newsroom. Consistently meet daily deadlines, as well as ethical, technical, legal and aesthetic standards.
Working Conditions: Work between the Portland office/studio and field as needed for newsgathering. In-state travel is common, but trips are often short; some out-of-state travel is required. Travel may include remote locations, working evening or weekends, and possibly working in inclement weather. Lifting and carrying equipment up to 25 lbs may be required, including some extended periods of standing and walking.
Required Qualifications:

* Bachelor's degree in Journalism or related field
* One year full-time professional experience as a news reporter or producer
* Demonstrated experience in use of digital audio recording and editing equipment and computer workstations

Preferred Qualifications:

* Radio news experience, preferably in a public broadcasting environment.
* Advanced skills in digital audio recording and editing
* Knowledge of Northwest region
* Outstanding writing, interviewing and on-air skills
* Ability to deliver reports and engage in conversation during live broadcasts
* Ability to work well with colleagues in collaborative newsroom environment
* Ability to follow multiple stories at once
* Ability to develop sources and follow beat area(s)
* Ability to contribute to shaping coverage of that beat within OPB's editorial structure
* Demonstrated ability and commitment to apply high ethical standards to reporting

To Apply: Please submit cover letter, resume, 2-3 audio samples of recently produced stories and salary history to: OPB HR, MS-WWW, 7140 SW Macadam Ave., Portland, OR 97219 or hr@opb.org
Application screening closes June 6, 2008, 5:00pm

Story Idea: Clinton and Obama Supporting Scaled-Down Occupation in Iraq

Institute for Public Accuracy
915 National Press Building, Washington, D.C. 20045
(202) 347-0020 * http://www.accuracy.org * ipa@accuracy.org
___________________________________________________

Monday, April 7, 2008



Interviews Available

JOSHUA HOLLAND, joshua.holland@alternet.org, http://www.alternet.org/waroniraq/81251
Holland just wrote the piece "Obama and Hillary Spin a 'Big Lie' About Iraq," which states: "On the campaign trail, the two candidates often speak of bringing the troops home and ending the war, and Democratic primary voters, 80 percent of whom want U.S. troops out of Iraq within 12 months, reward them with boisterous applause. ... Both Clinton and Obama have been very clear -- in the fine print -- about the fact that they will leave a significant number of 'residual forces' in Iraq, albeit with a more limited mission than the Bush administration has pursued."
Holland told the Institute for Public Accuracy today: "For example, Obama has played this trick of calling for the removal of all 'combat troops' in 16 months; what the campaign doesn't highlight is that it plans to leave 'non-combat troops,' but the idea of 'non-combat' troops in Iraq makes no sense. Also, the campaign is backing off of the 16 months pledge: 'Obama Advisor: 60,000 Troops Should Stay In Iraq Through 2010' ."

JEREMY SCAHILL, jeremy.scahill@gmail.com
Author of "Blackwater: The Rise of the World's Most Powerful Mercenary Army," Scahill said today: "All three of the major U.S. candidates for president have Iraq plans that would continue the occupation for the foreseeable future. McCain clearly would continue the Bush policy, but both Obama and Clinton have plans that would maintain some of the largest encampments of the occupation -- the Green Zone, the monstrous U.S. embassy, U.S. control of the Baghdad airport. Additionally, the Democratic candidates speak of maintaining a U.S. 'strike force' in Iraq and surrounding countries. In all, this could mean as many as 60,000-80,000 troops in Iraq for many years to come. On top of this, both Democrats have plans that would maintain a massive force of so-called 'private contractors' to support their Iraq policy. They are misleading their supporters when they passionately denounce the war and profess to support bringing it to an end. At best, what Obama or Clinton are offering is a scaled-down occupation -- but still a sizable one -- re-branded as a different mission.
"For the first time in 14 years, weapons manufacturers are donating more to Democrats than to Republicans. The Dems have received 52 percent of the military industry's political donations in this election cycle -- up from a low of 32 percent in 1996. There is a reason for this: it is good business policy." See: "Blackwater Seeps Into the Campaign" at .
"Meanwhile, the Bush administration has extended Blackwater's Iraq contract for yet another year. This is hardly a surprise and shows just how morally bankrupt the outsourcing of Washington's war -- and the de facto immunity offered to the shadow army -- has been from day one.
"Instead of holding this force accountable for its alleged crimes, the White House continues to reward Blackwater with lucrative contracts. The White House says Blackwater is necessary to protect U.S. officials. When will we hear any concern for the protection of Iraqi civilians who have consistently been wounded or killed by these forces over the past five years?" See: "Contract Justice: An Iraqi Translator Gets Prosecuted While Blackwater Gets Another Year in Iraq" at .

Story idea: BPA Makes Financial Settlement on Salmon/Dam Issue

For Immediate Release:
Monday, April 7, 2008

Contact:
Bill Shake, retired U.S. Fish &
Wildlife Service, bill.shake.1@verizon.net, 503-886-9721
Todd True, ttrue@earthjustice.org,
206-343-7340, ext 30
Sara Patton, sara@nwenergy.org,
206- 621-0094


BPA deal won’t recover salmon or protect ratepayers
SCIENTISTS, RATEPAYER GROUPS, AND SALMON ADVOCATES RESPOND TO FEDERAL-TRIBAL DEAL ON COLUMBIA-SNAKE RIVER DAMS

Portland, Ore — Individuals and groups that have long worked to restore abundant Columbia and Snake river salmon say today’s financial settlement between the federal Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) and three Indian tribes lacks scientific credibility and certainty for Northwest electricity ratepayers.

“This deal defies the decades of salmon science that say salmon recovery in the Columbia and Snake River Basin is not possible with habitat and hatchery programs alone,” said Bill Shake, former Assistant Regional Director of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Instead, any scientifically sound plan must include increased spill and flow for juvenile salmon survival and removal of four outdated dams on the lower Snake River. The Tribes and many others have said this in comments filed in January with the federal government opposing the plan that is the basis for today’s deal. While increased spill and flow and Snake River dam removal are not silver bullets, they are a necessary part of a larger plan. This deal suggests that salmon can recover without that action, which goes against everything the science tells us.”

The four dams create still water and impair the natural river flows young salmon need to migrate to sea. The dams also hinder the migration of adult salmon trying to return to spawn in the crystal clear, cold waters of high elevation tributaries and greatly exacerbate to the threat salmon face from global warming.

Under the agreement, BPA will pay the Tribes about $1 billion for tribal hatchery and habitat programs over 10years in exchange for the Tribes’ support of the latest federal plan to manage the dams and river flows on the Columbia and Snake rivers. “Support” means the Tribes must disavow their prior biological recommendations, which are steeply at odds with the federal approach. The Tribes also must refrain from advocating for measures they have long said were scientifically necessary for salmon survival such as removing the four dams on the lower Snake River.

Over the past 15 years, a series of court rulings, backed by the Tribes, has disqualified three of the last four federal dam operation plans because they failed to protect and recover Columbia and Snake river salmon listed under the Endangered Species Act.

In addition, court orders won by tribal, conservation and fishing groups have required dam operators to release additional water at certain times of the year to assist the migration of juvenile salmon from the rivers to the sea. Thanks to this additional river flow, federal fishery managers forecast a slight up-tick in returning spring run salmon this year.

“This new deal would rollback recent victories improving dam operations for salmon,” said Earthjustice attorney Todd True. “The opportunity to restore these fish is rapidly slipping away. BPA and the other federal agencies under this administration have consistently been more interested in protecting the status quo than in restoring wild salmon. Today’s deal is a good example of that failed approach.”

The money BPA will pay the Tribes is aimed at restoring salmon habitat primarily below the four problem Snake River dams and funding tribal hatcheries programs. But scientific studies, including those done by tribal biologists, conclude that recovering abundant salmon populations requires unimpeded access to the thousands of stream miles of clean cold water found in Idaho.

“The billion-dollar price tag for this agreement would be enough money to remove these dams and open access to these life-saving waters,” said NW Energy Coalition executive director, Sara Patton. “By ignoring science while suggesting that it is indeed meeting ESA requirements, BPA is continuing the uncertainty that has plagued this region and is putting Northwest ratepayers further at risk.”

Added Shake, the former Fish and Wildlife Service official: “We’ve been able to toss the salmon a life ring through court-ordered water releases for the last few years but we can’t get them off life support and out of the intensive care unit until we open up the good spawning water still available up in Idaho. This deal moves us no closer to that goal,”

To read the four Tribe’s January 2008 comments on the draft Biological Opinion’s scientific and
legal deficiencies, please see http://www.nwr.noaa.gov/Salmon-Hydropower/Columbia-Snake-
Basin/upload/CRITFC_A.pdf

Story idea: Iran Attack?

Institute for Public Accuracy
915 National Press Building, Washington, D.C. 20045
(202) 347-0020 * http://www.accuracy.org * ipa@accuracy.org
___________________________________________________

PM Monday, April 7, 2008

Petraeus to Target Iran?

Interviews Available

GARETH PORTER, porter.gareth50@gmail.com, http://www.ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=41886
Porter, author of "Perils of Dominance: Imbalance of Power and the Road to War in Vietnam," just wrote the piece "Petraeus Testimony to Defend False 'Proxy War' Line," which states: "Based on preliminary indications of his spin on the surprisingly effective armed resistance to the joint U.S.-Iraqi 'Operation Knights Assault' in Basra, Petraeus will testify that it was caused by Iran through a group of rogue militiamen who had split off from Moqtada al-Sadr's Mahdi Army and came under Iranian control. ...
"Iran has no reason to look for a small splinter group to advance its interests when it already enjoys a relationship of strategic cooperation with the [Iraqi] government itself. ...
"The interest of [the] Bush administration in keeping the 'proxy war' line alive has nothing to do with Iraqi realities. ... As a strategic weapon for justifying the administration's policies toward both Iraq and Iran, the theme of Iranian interference through 'Special Groups' is bound to be a central thread in the testimony [by Petreaus]."